Projectmeetup

Built at Build AI agents that own their inference - #SFTechWeek

Observer

I teach companies and small businesses how to use AI, and their session recordings are full of things they don't want fed to an AI vendor. This app, Observer, reads a session transcript on a model I control, Qwen3-4B on an Akamai RTX 4000, and returns what was taught, where people got stuck, and what to teach next. The interesting part is that the model is not trusted. It proposes moments and quotes; a Python script then checks that every quote appears literally in the transcript and sends the failures back for the real wording. In one block the model paraphrased twenty quotes and seventeen came back correct on the retry. A second pass checks the labels the same way, which dropped claimed "teaching moments" from 60% of the output to 11%. Owning the inference is what makes that affordable. On a metered API you swallow the bad output because retries cost money. On a GPU you control, you retry until it's right.

// latest_project_recording.mp4
// Project brief

I teach companies and small businesses how to use AI, and their session recordings are full of things they don't want fed to an AI vendor. This app, Observer, reads a session transcript on a model I control, Qwen3-4B on an Akamai RTX 4000, and returns what was taught, where people got stuck, and what to teach next. The interesting part is that the model is not trusted. It proposes moments and quotes; a Python script then checks that every quote appears literally in the transcript and sends the failures back for the real wording. In one block the model paraphrased twenty quotes and seventeen came back correct on the retry. A second pass checks the labels the same way, which dropped claimed "teaching moments" from 60% of the output to 11%. Owning the inference is what makes that affordable. On a metered API you swallow the bad output because retries cost money. On a GPU you control, you retry until it's right.

// Built with
// Watch & explore
// More from this event

Keep exploring what builders shipped.

All projects →

HackerSquad project

Inference Health Monitor

The README's rewritten and pushed. It now reads in plain language: What it is — a thermostat for a self-hosted AI engine: watches vital signs, eases off gracefully under surge instead of melting down What it does — the health checks, the fixed rules, load-shedding without restarts, the optional restart closer, self-narration, the demand simulations with report cards, and the Prefix-Cache Pilot The design rule — the model never decides, only narrates; boring Python makes every call Tech stack — Python 3 (no frameworks), vLLM, Qwen3-4B, Kubernetes, and requests as the single outside library

Akamai

HackerSquad project

Decision Lab on Akamai GPU

We show what is actually best (faster, cheaper, secure) to run on Akami GPUs: a JEV-style model (fine tune of Qwen3.5-9B in FP8 config with BF16 image-incoder; this model was fine tuned by Cloudflare and is called Clef). Specifically we show 3 demonstrations and compare Akamai GPU vs OpenAI GPT-6-Luna: 1) game playing AI 2) Email inbox filtering 3) Procurement So we show easy to demo game, and two real life business application.

Akamai

AgentFight

AgentFight

One small GPU, a whole team of agents. Everything runs on one Qwen3-4B model, served by vLLM on an Akamai Cloud GPU. 1) Mixture-of-Experts router A fast router (thinking off) reads each message and picks one of six experts. They all share the same weights and the same GPU. Each expert just has its own system prompt, sampling settings and thinking mode. - 🧠 reasoner: math, logic and code, with thinking on - 🔧 tool_agent: calls tools over MCP (time, safe calculator, dice, fetch_url) - ✍️ storyteller, 🎭 character, 🌍 polyglot (100+ languages), 📐 formatter (strict JSON) You can switch modes per message with /think or /no_think. "Compare thinking ON vs OFF" runs the same question both ways and shows latency and tokens per second. You can also force an expert with @polyglot, @character and so on. 2) Agent Arena: Red vs Blue prompt-injection defense A victim agent fetches an internal memo through an MCP tool and summarizes it. Some rounds hide a prompt injection in the memo, in several languages, telling the agent to leak the restricted appendix. A Blue defender checks the document and the draft summary, then returns ALLOW or BLOCK. A plain Python referee decides leaks by checking for canary honeytokens, so no LLM grades another LLM. - Live Gradio UI: Red, Victim and Blue stream token by token - Scoreboard: attack success, block rate, false positives, Blue latency, defense cost in tokens per round, results by language - Blue has three modes: Think, Fast and Off. You see exactly what extra inference buys you in security. - Fully sandboxed: the secrets are fake canaries and send_email only writes to a local log Why it matters: one 4B model on one Akamai GPU can act as a router, a tool user, an attacker target and its own security guard. And every run measures what that inference costs. Stack: Akamai Cloud GPU · vLLM · Qwen3-4B · MCP · Qwen-Agent · Gradio · Python Run: pip install -r requirements.txt python app.py # MoE router UI python arena_app.py # Agent Arena UI

Akamai